Where to put the reinforcement? – Finding the right strut-and-tie model through optimization

D-regions are usually designed using strut-and-tie models (STM) [1]. For complex structural geometries, however, generating suitable STM is challenging. The flow of forces must be known, taking into account the boundary conditions of adjacent structural areas. For this reason, FE stress computations serve as basis to derive statically consistent STM, which ensure equilibrium of forces. In the case of deep beams with openings, for example, this typically iterative procedure requires sufficient experience and engineering expertise. Developing STM thus often proves to be time-consuming and may be prone to errors.

A computational approach to automatically generate STM based on the method of topology optimization is presented. Starting from a ground structure consisting of struts and ties connected to each other to a predefined degree (Fig. a), the optimization algorithm reduces the number of members successively while maximum structural stiffness is pursued with the remaining. The degree of reduction
(i.e. the complexity of the resulting STM) can be controlled through intuitive parameters, such as the total number of permissible
struts and ties (Fig. b) [2]. The member forces can then be used to derive a reinforcement layout (Fig. c). The method is validated against established STM and also applied to several more complex structures
(deep beams, corbels, girders). Notes and recommendations
for practical application are given and the superiority of the automated,
optimization-aided generation of STM is demonstrated.

Related articles:

Issue 2015-02 Design of Concrete application (DoC App)

Smartphones and tablets in reinforced concrete design and detailing

The shift from conventional mobile phones to high-performance smartphones is almost irreversible. According to surveys, about 50?% of Germans owned a smartphone in February 2014 [1], and this ratio is...

Issue 2017-02 Designing of load-bearing concrete components

Get the right shape with appropriate reinforcement

Concrete can assume nearly any external shape. The same applies to the reinforcement which is not necessarily limited to rectangular patterns or component surfaces. The question is rather, which is...

Issue 2009-01 ACAD floor

CAD planning of precast floor slabs with AutoCAD

From the perspective of planning, the floor is a seemingly simple product, there being no complex and elaborate component geometries to deal with, as is the case with walls or façades. But there are...

Issue 2018-02 Design of concrete structures

Slender, non-reinforced compression members under ­biaxial eccentric loading

Compression members such as columns or walls are not only subjected to normal forces but also to bending moments resulting from rotations of adjacent structural components. If these rotations occur...

Issue 2013-02 Constraint actions in building construction

Implications for monolithic structures

Buildings are subject to a wide range of constraint forces as a result of their distinct statically indeterminate structure and their complex, mostly monolithic support conditions. These actions are...