Punching shear behavior of footings with a varying amount of punching shear reinforcement

Experimental investigations

The punching shear design provisions for footings and ground slabs were revised with the introduction of Eurocode 2 in Germany. In contrast to previous German codes, the location of the control perimeter has to be determined by iteration minimizing the punching shear capacity, which particularly applies to compact footings. For the design of the punching shear reinforcement, Eurocode 2 introduced a truss model with a strut inclination of 33° and a constant concrete contribution independent of the type of member. Due to safety related concerns, the German Annex to Eurocode 2 (EC2NA) defines deviating provisions for footings and ground slabs. In this context, EC2NA requires the shear reinforcement in the first two rows to carry the whole shear force (no concrete contribution). The results of existing punching tests on reinforced concrete footings can be used to evaluate the code equations for punching shear capacity without shear reinforcement (Fig. a) and maximum punching shear capacity (Fig. d). Nevertheless, due to the lack of systematic test series on reinforced concrete footings with a failure inside the shear-reinforced zone (Fig. b, c), an evaluation of the code provisions for the design of the shear reinforcement has not yet been possible.

To investigate the punching shear behavior of reinforced concrete footings with stirrups as punching shear reinforcement, a total of 11 punching tests (3 test series) with a varying amount of shear reinforcement were conducted. In the tests, the amount of shear reinforcement was varied by changing the stirrup diameter. In this contribution, the results of the tests are discussed and compared to the predictions according to Eurocode 2 and EC2NA.


Related articles:

Issue 02/2019 New experimental results on punching shear behavior of flat slabs with varying amount of punching shear reinforcement

Reduction of punching shear reinforcement

With introduction of Eurocode 2 in Germany, the punching shear design provisions for flat slabs were revised. In consequence of limited anchorage conditions of punching shear reinforcement elements in...

Issue 02/2017 Questions and answers

Punching shear design in practice

With introduction of Eurocode 2 in Germany (DIN EN 1992-1-1/NA [1] [2]) in 2012, the punching shear design provisions for flat slabs and column bases were revised compared to DIN 1045-1 [3]....


Punching shear reinforcement with increased bond resistance

Flat slabs with lattice girders as semi-precast construction system feature horizontal composite joints between the semi-precast concrete slabs and the in-situ concrete topping. Both the punching...

Issue 02/2017 Flat slabs and foundations

New punching shear reinforcement systems

The structural design of flat slab systems is usually governed by the punching shear resistance of the slab. To achieve a sufficient punching shear resistance at reasonable slab thickness, shear...

Issue 02/2014 New design tools for practice

Punching shear –

While DIN EN 1992-1-1 and the national annex of Germany treat punching shear design for in-situ concrete slabs and centrically loaded footings in great detail [1, 2], joints between semi precast...